Search Pharm Pro Search Pharm Pro Marketplace
 
 
Free White Papers






























 

Email for more information

Company's other products

Email to a colleague

Printer friendly format

Top 10 Things to Consider when Purchasing an Isolator

Companies are beginning to understand the advantages of performing aseptic operations within isolators. Regulators, as well, are promoting the technology primarily for the separation of personnel from the processes that can occur within isolators. However, many companies are purchasing isolated systems without considering all of the issues involved in their operation.

There are a number of things to consider when purchasing an isolator including initial and long-term operating costs, delivery timelines, mechanical quality and customer support, among others. The following are ten often overlooked mechanical and operational considerations that are also important to investigate when selecting an isolator for purchase.

1. Chamber Leak Tightness

Example of an in-line isolator.
Isolators are enclosures that are sealed to some standard of leak tightness. There are a number of reasons to seal isolators. One reason is for operator safety during the bio-decontamination process. The solutions used for chamber sanitization are dangerous to personnel and need to be confined to the chamber and air handling system. A second reason is for product or process safety. A sealed enclosure reduces the opportunity for particles to enter the chamber and possibly contaminate the process occurring in the isolated system. A third reason is for containment of hazardous materials or products that are dangerous to personnel or the environment. In this case, specific leak rate requirements should be set based on acceptable exposure limits, keeping in mind factors such as the volume of the surrounding room and the volume of fresh air exchange. Running the isolator at a negative pressure compared to the surrounding room may be required.

A goal of isolator design should be to reduce the number and size of chamber penetrations. Reducing the number of penetrations reduces the overall leak potential of the system. The same is the case for the size of penetrations, as larger ones can have a higher potential to leak. For penetrations like doors, an evolution of seal types has developed over time. Simple mechanical-action passive seals have evolved into seals with active action, such as inflatable seals, and advancements such as monitoring systems. A further refinement is the vacuum door seal. The vacuum serves both as an active seal, as the doors cannot be opened when it is engaged, and as a smart seal, as the vacuum is continuously monitored to alert operators when leaks occur. Because the seal is a vacuum, any leaks will be drawn into the seal area, thus protecting both the internal and external environments.

2. Materials of Construction

There are several reasons why material type and finish are crucial to proper isolator operations. The isolator and any equipment within it must be cleanable and not degrade when cleaned. This is why low carbon stainless steel, polished to an appropriate surface finish and passivated, and glass are the materials of choice for isolator systems. Both are cleanable and handle all but the most corrosive cleaners. They, and other common materials used in pharmaceutical operations, are compatible with the sanitant solutions used for bio-decontamination. These material considerations must be further expanded to include the air handling equipment. Air handling systems with internal surfaces of painted steel and other incompatible materials should be avoided.

All materials internal to the chamber, including process equipment like fillers, must be tested to ensure that the sanitant used for bio-decontamination will effectively reduce bioburden to appropriate levels. It has been shown in several studies that both material type and material surface finish have an effect on surface bio-decontamination. Problem materials should be avoided. Unique materials should be tested prior to use.

Another critical aspect of materials internal to the chamber is the likelihood of them absorbing and outgassing the sanitant solution used for bio-decontamination. Excessive use of elastomers and plastics should be avoided, and Silicone in particular should be eliminated from the chamber where possible.

3. Product Requirements

Example of a corner isolator.
Certain products and other materials used in the processes that commonly occur in isolators, particularly protein-containing solutions, are sensitive to the solutions used for isolator bio-decontamination. There are several ways to mitigate this issue. One method is to ensure that you reduce the opportunity for long-term outgassing and contact with the process by avoiding the use of absorptive materials. A second strategy is to modify or supplement sensitive materials in order to reduce sensitivity to the sanitant. For example, special growth agars for use in isolators exist that have been treated with chemicals that counteract the effect of peroxide. This ensures that environmental monitoring results are not affected.

In regards to protecting product that is processed in isolators, two things should be done. Firstly, the sensitivity of the product to residual sanitant should be quantified. The best way to do this is to actually expose product to sanitant in a controlled fashion. A test isolator can be used to expose filled product containers, as this best mimics the actual exposure environment. This activity will allow you to set an acceptable residual concentration and exposure time for your process. Once this is accomplished, the chamber aeration process should be optimized to ensure that sanitant concentration are lowered to acceptable levels prior to the start of your process.

4. Environmental Monitoring

The methods, locations and frequency for environmental monitoring must be considered in both the design of the isolator and for the process occurring within it. Particulate monitoring, for example, requires either chamber penetrations to draw the air to sample or portable equipment that can be bio-decontaminated and passed into the chamber prior to use. Monitoring points often consist of isokinetic funnels that are used to sample representative air with minimal disruption to its unidirectional flow. Automated monitoring equipment can be integrated into the chamber design and the isolator control system.

Viable monitoring can consist of both automated air sampling and manual sampling methods like settling plates and swabs. Manual methods require a method for passing sampling materials into and out of the isolator. One solution is to load enough materials for one isolator campaign into the chamber and bio-decontaminating the outer surface of the material bags during chamber sanitization. Another solution is to use transfer isolators that dock with the main isolator chamber for transfer. However, these chambers require development and validation of a separate, shorter bio-decontamination cycle.

Sampling locations should be considered carefully. They should be immediately adjacent to critical activities. This is not always easy to accomplish when activities occur in areas that are difficult to reach or inaccessible. The location of glove ports is often critical to successful, manual EM methods.

5. Glove Testing

It is evident that the FDA requires both visual inspection and automated testing methods for isolator gloves and sleeves. That being said, there are important considerations for both of these methods. Visual inspection requires training and certification of personnel as well as a method for execution. When and where visual methods are used is critical. Ideally, gloves should be inspected prior to installation for ease of access. However, it is easier to do this with the gloves installed in the ports, as repeated removal takes time and can harm the gloves. The reliability of inspecting gloves through a thick glass door must be considered, and opening the door will likely be required for this method.

There are several automated testing methods, some of which require removal of the gloves. Yet this is not an ideal technique because the gloves can be damaged, and connections and separate sleeves are not tested with these methods. On the other hand, testing in place will take more time, as gloves cannot normally be tested while other processes are occurring in the isolator. A solution to the issue of time is to test many, if not all, of the isolator gloves simultaneously.

Glove age is often a factor in glove testing accuracy, particularly in regards to the system’s ability to detect small holes. The latest generations of glove testers precondition gloves using pressure pulses. This assures that all gloves exhibit the same elastic properties prior to testing, regardless of age. It is possible to quickly detect holes to a quantifiable level using this technique.

6. Controlling Particulate Generation

Particulates, whether viable or non-viable, must be controlled at all times inside of the isolator. There are several ways to accomplish this. One is to ensure that particles from the surrounding environment do not get into the chamber. A combination of leak tightness and positive differential pressure will aid this effort. Items that are located in the isolator or that enter the isolator during processing should be designed to shed few if any particles. This includes equipment, parts, tubing and disposable items and the isolator chamber, including elastomers used for sealing penetrations. Items entering the isolator, as well as the isolator itself, should be thoroughly cleaned to remove particles prior to bio-decontamination or sterilization.

Processes that occur in isolators should be monitored during operation to determine if excessive particle generation is an issue. Particular care should be taken for processes that occur near areas of open manipulation. One process that can be of concern is the opening of outer packaging for sterile items. Packaging held together with adhesives or that is easily ripped during opening often generates particles. Special care should be taken for processes that require repeated opening of packaging, as this can cause a continuous generation of particles. Monitoring processes in which the particles are eliminated from the environment via airflow as well as those that require repeated opening of packaging to ensure particles are not generated in excess is recommended.

7. Material Handling

One challenge of operating an isolator is getting materials in and out of the isolator in an aseptic manner. In fact, material transfer is a major consideration when deciding whether or not to perform processes within isolators. Certain processes that involve handling large volumes of materials or that use very large equipment may not function within isolators. Processes that involve the use of non-sterile materials also may not seem sensible to operate within isolators.

Materials can be brought in an out of the isolator either in batches or in a continuous stream, depending on process needs. Some processes require both types of transfer to occur simultaneously. Batch transfers are commonly performed using sterile transfer cans or bags that attach to specially-designed transfer port systems. Continuous transfer, common for product filling operations, is accomplished via mousehole penetrations designed to protect the isolator environment by controlling the amount of air that flows out. Sliding mousehole partitions can also be used so that the chamber is closed after each item enters into it.

Removing bad or broken items from the isolator can be performed using special vacuum systems. These systems attach to sterile transfer ports normally located on the bottom or lower portion of the chamber. Removal of items into a sterile intermediary container is performed using a combination of valving and an automatic vacuum system to ensure the chamber environment is not compromised.

8. Bio-Decontamination Method Integration

Various methods exist for automatic bio-decontamination of isolators. The systems on the market today can be grouped into two categories: stand-alone and integrated. Stand alone systems are designed to bio-decontaminate a wide variety of chambers, rooms and other enclosed spaces. They normally consist of a sanitant injection system, a fan for moving air, tubing to connect to ports on the isolator, and a descant system for controlling humidity. At times, they also have a heater for heating the air stream and a catalyst for breaking down the sanitant after use. Controls for the system are rarely integrated with the isolator controls except for stop/start commands.

Integrated systems are typically installed in the isolator structure. Isolators that are large enough to have an air handling unit often have a different type of bio-decontamination system that is designed to work with the AHU. Operations like sanitant injection and humidity control are performed by the bio-decontamination system, whereas air flow and control is performed by the AHU. The bio-decontamination system is sized for the chamber it services. Controls for the system are, at times, integrated with the isolator controls.

Fully integrated bio-decontamination systems share the same control system, and often the same human-machine interface, as the isolator. The bio-decontamination system is still integrated as part of the AHU and sized according to the chamber. Larger, state-of-the-art isolators are serviced by a full HVAC system, which performs air handling, temperature control, humidity control and chamber aeration after bio-decontamination is complete. In these systems, the bio-decontamination system is greatly simplified and performs sanitant injection only.

9. Equipment in the Chamber

Equipment located in isolators must have certain attributes in order to successfully perform their functions in this environment. The equipment must be designed to be cleaned and bio-decontaminated. If the equipment must penetrate the enclosure for mechanical connections or power supply, any interfaces must be designed to be a seamless as possible. If the isolator is mounted to a machine plate, the seam between the two must be sealed. Often, Silicone is used for this purpose. The latest in technology for sealing isolators to machine plates includes multi-component epoxy compounds that are rigid, do not absorb sterilant, and are resistant to the harshest cleaning solutions.

Reliability is also a key attribute of equipment operated within isolators. Interventions are limited, so frequent equipment breakdowns are not acceptable. It is important to purchase high quality equipment designed for little direct input during use. It is also recommended to operate the equipment before each bio-decontamination cycle to ensure correct function.

Equipment within isolators must be designed for easy access during operation. Any manipulations of the equipment after bio-decontamination must be performed through gloveports. Therefore, adjustments to the equipment must not require a high degree of tactile effort. Equipment for typical operations within isolators has been specifically designed for isolator use. Making connections, changing parts, correcting failures and other manipulations are often designed to be performed with one gloved hand.

Another important activity is isolator mock-ups. Mock-ups assure all equipment is located correctly within the chamber, glove ports are located to ensure correct access and transfer ports and mouseholes are located to ensure correct supply flow. Participation from the actual end-user groups is essential, as ergonomic considerations need to be addressed. Part of mock-up testing should include insuring that the gloves can be fully extended into the chamber for bio-decontamination.

10. Airflow

Recently, there has been much discussion on the topic of airflow within isolators. Some have questioned the need for airflow altogether during processing. However, one must consider the nature of the isolator itself when designing airflow requirements. Two major types of isolators exist: closed isolators and open isolators. Whereas closed isolators are fully sealed, open isolators have open, mousehole penetrations for transfer of items in and out. Unidirectional airflow is required for correct operation of open isolators, particularly when item transfers are occurring. It is generally accepted that closed isolators can have unidirectional, turbulent or no airflow depending on the process.

Airflow is also critical during bio-decontamination. Good airflow ensures thorough distribution of sanitant, proper control of humidity and temperature and sufficient aeration to remove sanitant to safe levels. Large isolators may require full HVAC systems in order to assure good air flow and distribution because of the volume of air that is involved. Sufficient airflow is also required at the end of each cycle to ensure complete aeration of the sterilant from the chamber.

Conclusions

As can be seen, there are many mechanical and operational considerations that need to be considered when selecting an isolator for purchase. It is important to investigate these items during the acquisition process. Partnering with an experienced isolator supplier who is able to implement state-of-the-art features and processes will ensure the success of your isolator project.

Pharmaceutical Processing
Advantage Business Media


 

© 2008 Advantage Business Media. All rights reserved
Use of this website is subject to its terms of use
New Privacy Statement